HEALTH campaigners have called for more heart patients to benefit from cardiac rehabilitation after new figures showed only 3% of patients with heart failure were offered the treatment.
Across Scotland, a total of 65.2% of heart attack patients were referred for cardiac rehabilitation, as were 68.5% of people who had bypass surgery. But just 3.1% of those with heart failure were referred for rehabilitation, along with only 7.4% of those with unstable angina.
The British Heart Foundation (BHF) Scotland and Chest, Heart and Stroke Scotland (CHSS) are now calling for more of these patents to benefit from the treatment, which includes supervised exercise sessions along with education to help patients live as full and healthy a life as possible.
The two charities argued that the rehab was cheap, costing about £600 per patient, and may save lives.
Ben McKendrick, senior policy and public affairs manager at BHF Scotland, said: "Cardiac rehab saves lives but there is an unacceptable gulf between the levels of support offered to patients with different heart conditions."
CHSS chief executive David Clark said: "Cardiac rehab should be fully recognised as being central to the treatment and care of all heart patients who might benefit."
Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon said "excellent" progress had been made in offering rehabilitation.
She said: "In 2007 around 45% of people in the clinical priority groups had access to cardiac rehabilitation, this figure has now risen to 65%.
"While this substantial increase is a great achievement, we recognise that there is still much more to do to help improve the quality of care for people living with heart failure."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article