BILLIONAIRE businessman Sir Tom Hunter has stepped into the independence referendum debate, warning politicians to stop scaremongering.
He said what was needed was a positive debate about the future so people could assess both sides of the argument and then vote with "deep insight" because "our children deserve no less".
Sir Tom said: "I'd like to see the debate about independence anchored in ambition and I think it's time for those politicians who use scaremongering as a tactic to halt the independence bandwagon to stop; it's a recipe for delivering precisely what they don't want because Scottish voters are not daft."
He also questioned claims the ballot should take place before Alex Salmond's planned timetable of 2014.
He said: "We have only lightly touched the edges of the debates we need for our country's future; do they really want to compress that debate for political expediency? A speedy referendum might suit some, but it certainly doesn't suit democracy."
Sir Tom also claimed there was an over-reliance in Scotland on the benefits system. He said: "The fact is the welfare state has enabled us to become pampered, dependent people who expect what others strive and graft for."
Adding that he was not a "right-wing zealot", he said: "For the most vulnerable, most in need in our society, it is sacrosanct. However, the pendulum of support has, in my view, swung too far and we expect too much from our state when in many respects we have not earned that expectation."
A spokesman for Finance Secretary John Swinney said: "Sir Tom's comments on the referendum – calling for a positive debate, deploring the scaremongering of the anti-independence parties and supporting the Scottish Government's timescale for the referendum – are extremely welcome."
He added official figures showed welfare spending in Scotland represented a smaller share of Scottish tax revenues compared to the UK as a whole.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article