On the face of it, the latest shake-up of arts funding by Creative Scotland moves more than 40 of Scotland's arts companies from a position of stability to instability.
Flexible funding was a relatively short-term funding method, a step below the rock-solid foundation funding, but it afforded companies time to plan shows, pay bills, hire staff and breathe easily.
To be moved on to a project-by-project funding basis will, therefore, for many not only be onerous (they will now have to apply for project funds before flexible funding runs out next year) but also deeply worrying. For these companies, June and July will now be a vital time to discuss their futures in meetings with Creative Scotland. Those on annual funding will not be sleeping soundly either, especially the festivals, such as Celtic Connections, which have to plan significantly in advance.
Creative Scotland says it was not forced into these changes. But the levers behind its greatest power – money – are changing significantly.
Yes, it has new strategic aims and desires, including a pressing desire to open up access to culture and the arts across the nation, but the large increase in lottery funds, which cannot be used for revenue funding, and the comparative decline in Government money, meant, it says, that something had to change.
For some companies that are tried and tested and lauded for their work, being put on project funding may seem like a demotion of some kind, even if Creative Scotland is adamant there is no hierarchy in its funding model.
More change is to come: each sector of the arts in Scotland is being reviewed, and we have yet to hear details of a £3.4m "strategic commissioning" plan. There may be more storms before the calm.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article