FOREIGN Secretary William Hague said international efforts to ease the escalating conflict in Syria were focused on trying to reach a peaceful transition and that foreign military intervention was not being considered.
"We are not looking for any foreign military intervention. I think we should not think about it in terms of another Libya," he told a news conference in the Pakistani capital Islamabad.
"All our efforts are going into supporting a peaceful transition in Syria, and a peaceful solution," said Mr Hague, in a press conference with Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar.
"If there is any violent solution, it would clearly involve many more deaths and a great deal of hardship for the Syrian people."
Mr Hague's comments came as it emerged an international "contact group" will meet soon to discuss how to make Syria's Government and opposition groups abide by a peace plan brokered by Kofi Annan.
"The objective of creating this group is to give teeth to the plan, to convince the parties to implement the plan in its entirety. It is not to create a new plan," Mr Annan's spokesman Ahmad Fawzi told a UN media briefing. The contact group meeting has been in doubt because of US opposition to Iran's involvement.
Iran, along with Russia and China, which both blocked UN Security Council efforts to put pressure on Syria, backs Syria's Government, despite UN human rights investigators accusing it of crimes against humanity.
In Syria yesterday, at least 10 people were killed when Government forces barraged an eastern city with mortar shells as protesters were dispersing, while clashes broke out elsewhere in the country, activists said.
The violence comes as President Bashar Assad's regime faces international pressure over brutal tactics against the opposition, with the UN accusing the Government of using children as young as nine as human shields.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article