Remember the Arab Spring?
Less than 18 months ago it was a beacon of hope across the Middle East as Tunisia, then Egypt and subsequently Libya saw their people rise up against dictatorship.
How tragic it now is to watch recent events in Egypt where the old regime, still rooted in the armed forces and security services, refuses to relinquish power. What has occurred in Cairo over the past few days amounts to a silent coup d'etat. Not only has the elected parliament been dissolved but along with it the powerbase of the Muslim Brotherhood, which won the largest number of seats barely six months ago. Eroded, too, are the aspirations of the revolutionaries of Tahrir Square.
As the country faces a presidential election, many feel they are "between two fires" – a reference to the candidates, Ahmed Shafiq, former President Hosni Mubarak's last prime minister and Mohammed Mursi of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Among those who took to Cairo's streets to rid themselves of Mubarak there is now the sense of a need to do the same again to ensure that the last vestiges of his old guard are finally consigned to the past. Just what that will entail is most likely to involve more violence.
Meanwhile, the revolutionary gains in Libya remain fragile, and there is ongoing crisis in Syria. If the sacrifices and tentative gains of the Arab Spring are not to be squandered, the international community must not take its diplomatic eye off the ball at this crucial moment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article