CAPTAIN Scott and other members of his ill-fated expedition to the South Pole were killed by inadequate rations, research has shown.
The men expended more energy than Olympic athletes as they hauled their sledges across hundreds of miles of ice.
Their rations were too high in protein and too low in fat, and did not deliver enough calories, say scientists. As a result, the polar explorers starved to death.
"There has been much speculation about what Scott died of," said lead researcher Dr Lewis Halsey, from the University of Roehampton in London. "Almost certainly his death was due to chronic and extreme emaciation."
Appalling conditions greeted Robert Falcon Scott and his team in Antarctica, proving too much for the mechanical sledges, ponies and dogs they brought with them. On January 17, 1912 they reached the pole, only to find that a Norwegian party led by Roald Amundsen had beaten them there.
In mid-February, team member Edgar Evans died, followed by frost-bitten Lawrence Oates who walked into a blizzard to his death. Scott, Edward Wilson and Henry Bowers died in their tent on March 29, 1912 .
Dr Halsey's team examined the expedition in light of today's knowledge of nutrition and exercise.
Scott's rations consisted of biscuits, pemmican (a fat and protein mix), butter, sugar, chocolate, cereals and raisins, with initial supplements of pony meat.
Each of the explorers was burning nearly 7000 calories a day, it is estimated, but was consuming only around 4400 calories. Their rations were also too low in fat, the experts said.
They conclude: "It seems reasonable to conclude that augmented rations based on modern physiological wisdom would have kept them alive.."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article