ALMOST 30% of SNP backers do not want independence and would prefer to see extra powers for Holyrood instead, according to a poll published today.
The telephone snapshot puts the number of Nationalist supporters backing independence at 63%, while 28% prefer a devo-plus option of giving Holyrood more control over tax and borrowing powers to meet its spending pledges.
The policy would leave Westminster responsible primarily for VAT and National Insurance with most other taxes devolved to Holyrood. Devo-plus differs from devo-max, which envisages handing over all tax powers to the Scottish Parliament.
The figures emerged in a breakdown of the Ipsos Mori survey of 1000 people for the independent think-tank Reform Scotland.
The poll's headline numbers had been published earlier and showed 29% of people favoured the status quo, 27% independence and 41% devo-plus.
Asked if Scotland should remain part of the UK with unchanged devolved powers, 66% of Conservative supporters agreed as did 37% of Labour, 40% of Liberal Democrat and 6% of SNP supporters, plus 31% of non-aligned voters.
Asked if Scotland should remain part of the UK but with devo-plus powers, 30% of Tory supporters agreed as did 52% of Labour, 53% of LibDems and 28% of SNP supporters, as well as 50% of non-aligned voters.
Asked if Scotland should become fully independent and "separate from the rest of the UK", 1% of Tories agreed as did 7% of Labour, 3% of LibDems, 63% of SNP supporters and 17% of non-aligned voters.
The poll also showed that, when asked if the anti-independence parties should campaign for more powers for Holyrood, 58% of Tory supporters agreed as did 73% of Labour, 74% of LibDems, 64% of SNP and 67% of non-aligned voters.
A Reform Scotland spokesman said before people were asked a number of questions, devo-plus was explained to them.
Ruth Davidson, the Scottish Conservative leader, described the poll as a "damning verdict" on Alex Salmond's failure to provide hard facts about what independence would mean for Scots. She argued it was no wonder the First Minister was "desperate to get a second question on the referendum ballot paper when his own supporters are now getting cold feet about separation".
She added: "Let there be no doubt, this is a vote between separation and devolution and the people of Scotland should be offered a single question that is fair, legal and decisive."
Patricia Ferguson, Scottish Labour's Constitution spokeswoman, said: "This is yet further proof that not only is independence unpopular with the Scottish people, it's also not something that huge numbers of SNP voters really want."
She insisted the Nationalists had a mandate to hold a referendum on independence "and that issue alone, not anything that the SNP and Alex Salmond think they can use to get themselves off the hook".
In contrast, the SNP said the snapshot was bad news for the Better Together campaign as it showed almost three-quarters of Labour voters wanted their party to campaign for more powers for Holyrood.
Angus Robertson, the SNP campaign director, said: "This poll is disastrous for the anti-independence parties, who stubbornly refuse to listen not only to their own supporters but also to the substantial body of opinion across Scotland calling for a more powers option."
He said that while the SNP would campaign for independence in the referendum it also recognised there was a "real debate to be had about bringing proper job-creating powers to the Scottish Parliament".
Mr Robertson added: "The question Johann Lamont and Margaret Curran have to answer is why they want decisions for Scotland to continue to be made by a Tory government Scotland rejected, instead of a Scottish Parliament 100% elected directly elected by people in Scotland?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article