A fresh row over executive pay flared yesterday when a leading union claimed plans were being drawn up for a new bonus scheme for executives at Network Rail.
The Transport Salaried Staffs Association said senior bosses at the rail infrastructure firm would be in line to share £1.7 million in 2014.
NR said no executives would receive a bonus this year and no decision had been taken about any future payments.
Any long-term arrangements, covering 2012-15, will be voted on by members.
NR, which holds its annual meeting later this month, said a letter had been sent to members from the chairman of the remuneration committee, which pointed out that the company faced a "worsening executive retention and recruitment issue".
The letter said the remuneration committee was proposing to increase the base salary of executive directors in line with the outcome of an internal management pay review.
Suggested performance-related retention payments will be put to the AGM for approval.
The details are being discussed at a members' workshop in London today.
Manuel Cortes, general secretary of the Transport Salaried Staffs Association, said: "These people must be living on Planet Zog if they do not understand the public's outrage over unjustified bonuses. NR is in all but name a public company receiving £4 billion a year in direct subsidy.
"Passengers want to see that money go into producing a better and cheaper railway, not into the wallets of directors who are already handsomely rewarded."
Shadow Transport Secretary Maria Eagle said: "Passengers facing annual fare rises of up to 11% will be staggered that our rail industry could be so out of touch and doesn't recognise how times have changed.
"This is yet another example of why the debate over the future of the rail industry is so necessary.
"Passengers expect Network Rail to be focusing on improving train punctuality not obsessing with their already sizeable pay packets."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article