The family of Alison Hume, who died following a failed rescue from a disused mine shaft, have criticised a top fire officer for speaking out about the tragedy while the prosecution of individual firefighters has yet to be ruled out.
Brian Sweeney, chief fire officer of Strathclyde Fire and Rescue, said that while the 2008 rescue was not the brigade's "finest hour", firefighters should be able to work without fear of ending up in court.
However, the parents of Ms Hume, a mother-of-two, said Mr Sweeney should make no comment on the case while his officers' conduct on the night was still being reviewed by the Crown Office.
Hugh Cowan, the victim's stepfather, said: "Alison's death is still under investigation by the Crown Office.
"Until a decision is taken over prosecuting his brigade or his officers, Mr Sweeney should be making no comment.
"The family find it upsetting to read of his remarks. His statements are also inaccurate."
Mr Sweeney spoke about the Hume case at the Kilbirnie Street lecture at Glasgow University.
A sheriff ruled last November that the 44-year-old solicitor from Galston, East Ayrshire, could have survived if Mr Sweeney's officers had acted quicker to rescue her from a 50ft pit.
He said: "For so many of our firefighters today, the fear of losing your life has long since been overtaken by the fear of prosecution for doing our job.
"Many of my officers are fearful that if they place firefighters in direct danger, they are going to end up in handcuffs."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article