Students continue to choose universities based on reputation and history rather than quality of teaching and cost, research suggests.
A new study has found that the idea that students now pick institutions based on factors which the university can control, like price and degree content, is "questionable".
Instead the traditional pecking order remains, with individuals preferring older, Russell Group institutions over newer ones.
The study, by researchers at Edinburgh University, analysed application and entrance data for universities in England and Scotland from 1996 to 2010.
Universities were split into four categories – leading Russell Group institutions, others that were universities before 1992 when higher education was expanded, former polytechnics that became universities after 1992, and other institutions that offer higher education but do not have university status.
The researchers looked for changes in application patterns to see if there had been any movement over the years in the universities preferred by students.
They also examined the quality of qualifications held by students who applied to each university.
The paper argues that if the introduction of tuition fees led to a move towards a market-based system, with universities competing on areas they can control, like teaching quality, content and price, this could lead to changes in the universities preferred by students.
But the study found a "stable hierarchy", with students in 1996 and 2010 preferring Russell Group universities, and concludes there is "no evidence" that distinctions in status have become less important.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article