The UK Government has no plans to review abortion laws, Health Minister Earl Howe has insisted.
Lord Howe told peers that despite his boss, Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt, speaking out in favour of halving the current 24-week term limit, the Government would take no action.
Home Secretary Theresa May and Culture Secretary Maria Miller have also suggested they would support a reduction in the limit to 20 weeks. However, at question time in the House of Lords, Lord Howe said: "The Government has no plans to review the Abortion Act. It is Parliamentary practice that any proposals to change abortion laws come from backbench members and decisions are on the basis of free votes."
For the opposition, Baroness Thornton said people were worried following the statements from Mr Hunt and other senior ministers. She said: "They are entitled to their personal views but we need to know how that might influence public policy."
She asked Lord Howe to clarify that his initial answer meant "the Government will not support any change to the abortion time limit for the duration of this Parliament".
Lord Howe told her Mr Hunt had been expressing a personal view. He added: "Successive governments have taken the view they should rest on the evidence and there is no call from the main medical bodies that a review of the Act in relation to time limits is needed."
Tory former minister Lord Hamilton of Epsom said the current abortion legislation had been introduced by a private member's bill. He said: "Surely that is the right way to deal with these matters."
However, the Bishop of Derby, the Rt Rev Alastair Redfern, asked whether there should be a debate on the consequences of the "enormous increase in the number of abortions".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article