SENIOR SNP politicians hoping to overturn the party's longstanding opposition to Nato have received backing from an independent think-tank.
The Scots-based Nato Watch group concludes in a new report that the SNP's aim of a nuclear weapons-free Scotland is compatible with membership of the military alliance.
The report, Human Security in an Independent Scotland, recommends Scotland should work for the "global abolition of all weapons of mass destruction".
However, it is sympathetic to joining Nato, arguing Scotland could play a major role in encouraging nuclear disarmament from within the alliance.
It questions whether an independent Scotland would have the time and resources to build security and defence alliances which bypass Nato.
However, it concludes that membership of Nato should be considered separately and put to voters in a referendum.
Nato Watch director Dr Ian Davis said: "I would suggest Scotland could both make a positive contribution to a re-defined collective security as a member of Nato and, by working with other like-minded countries, challenge Nato's nuclear policy".
The move will be debated at the SNP conference on Friday.
SNP defence spokesman Angus Robertson said: "This confirms polling evidence which shows 75% of people support Scotland remaining in Nato and also a strong majority for removing Trident."
SNP MSP Jamie Hepburn said: "My position is it is incompatible to seek to remove nuclear weapons from Scotland and shelter under a nuclear-armed organisation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article