Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith's welfare reforms intended to encourage claimants to find work could in fact leave many households worse off, a think-tank has warned.
The Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) also questioned whether computer systems at the Department for Work and Pensions would be able to cope with the introduction of the new universal credit, which is due to replace a raft of out-of-work benefits from October 2013.
It warned the overall effect of Mr Duncan Smith's benefit changes would be to add to the complexity of a benefits system supposed to be simpler.
Mr Duncan Smith has always said the key principle behind the universal credit is to remove disincentives to claimants taking jobs, by ensuring people are always better off in work. While universal credit would incentivise more people to take so-called "mini-jobs" – involving less than 16 hours a week – it would encourage people to take the next step into full-time work enabling them to move out of poverty.
However, the JRF said many households would actually be worse off or only marginally better off as a result of the changes.
l Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has admitted that axing child benefit for the richest families was an "excruciatingly difficult" decision.
Letters will be going out from HM Revenue and Customs to advise around one million households on £50,000 or more how their payments will change.
Tory backbenchers fear a backlash from traditional voters over the move that will end entitlement to child benefit.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article