OBESITY is more prevalent among Church of Scotland members than any other religious group north of the Border, including those with no affiliation.
Analysis of official Scottish Health Survey findings, from the Scottish Government, shows followers of Buddhism and Hinduism have better waistlines, with just 15% classed as obese.
Among non-religious groups, studies show 26% suffer from obesity, but the rate is 30% among Church of Scotland members.
Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus were the most likely religious groups in Scotland to eat five fruit and vege-tables a day. Some schools of Buddhism forbid eating meat and of Scottish Buddhists those eating the recommended number of fruit and vegetables was the highest at 63%.
Dr Gerry McCartney, head of the Public Health Observatory Division for NHS Health Scotland, said many other factors, as well as the dietary rules of the different religions may help explain the findings.
While the Scottish Health Survey analysts took age into account, they did not adjust results for obesity risk factors, such as deprivation. Differences in wealth profiles or locations of religious groups may influence lifestyle choices more than faith itself.
However, Dr McCartney also said the culture of some religions may indirectly promote good health by, for example, supporting the equal distribution of wealth among members.
The study, out yesterday, found mental well being among Catholics was signifi-cantly lower than average.
An Equality and Human Rights Commission Scotland spokesman said: "This survey appears to be a very useful overview of the health of all Scotland's people, and underlines that, unfortunately, experiencing worse outcomes is not just about where you live, but also about who you are."
Rev Sally Foster-Fulton, convener of the Church and Society Council of the Church of Scotland, said while data "must provide useful information to health care professionals," she felt the link between deprivation and poor health was more a concern.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article