Iran's parliament will investigate the death of a blogger in police custody following international condemnation of the incident.
Sattar Beheshti, who ran an anti-government blog, was arrested in his home on October 30 after receiving death threats. The 35-year-old died in custody, possibly as a result of torture, according to Amnesty International.
Deputy parliament speaker Mohammad Hassan Abu-Torabi Fard has said a committee will investigate the death.
Outspoken politician Ahmad Tavakoli, who represents Tehran, criticised Iran's judiciary for failing to address Mr Beheshti's death.
"I recommend that instead of dealing harshly with bloggers, you go after corrupt officials," he said.
Iran has in the past rejected criticism of its human rights record as political and motivated by Western opposition to the Islamic Republic. But its leadership has taken action on other allegations of mistreatment of prisoners.
The media is tightly controlled in Iran and blogging has become one of the few outlets – albeit a risky one – for criticising the state.
Iran clamped down on dissent after mass protests against the disputed re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009. Iranian authorities have acknowledged that three people arrested in the post-election unrest were killed in custody.
Mr Beheshti's family initially gave interviews to media outlets on the circumstances of his arrest, but the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran said it had not been able to contact them in recent days and believed the family had been ordered to keep silent.
The Committee to Protect Journalists said Iran must explain Mr Beheshti's sudden death.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article