PLANS to extend a high- speed rail network to Scotland have won the strong support of councils, businesses and transport authorities in the north of England.
A survey of 32 key organisations showed that nearly 90% saw building a line north of Manchester and Leeds, which are due to have a high-speed rail connection to London by 2033, as important or very important.
A key driver is the belief that the East and West Coast Main Lines will be full by 2030, putting a strain on train journeys to Scotland.
The findings, due to be published today by high- speed lobby group Greengauge 21, provide a welcome boost for the Scottish Government's ambitions to be included in a UK network of new rail lines capable of carrying 250mph trains and follow Alex Salmond's calls for a "northern accord" to be forged between Scotland and the north of England.
Infrastructure Secretary Nicola Sturgeon announced plans earlier this week to push ahead with a new high-speed line connecting Glasgow and Edinburgh.
Jim Steer, an influential transport expert who founded Greengauge 21 in 2006 to push the case for high-speed rail, said a key question now emerging was how to bridge the "northern gap" between the planned high-speed network in England and the Scottish border.
The involvement of councils and transport authorities could be an important factor in this as they could have a role in deciding whether a high speed rail route is funded.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article