one of Scotland's leading historians has criticised the controversial comments of the writer and artist Alasdair Gray, after he wrote an essay which categorised the English population in Scotland as "settlers" or "colonists".
Professor Tom Devine, professor of history Edinburgh University, said Gray's language and opinion, expressed in an essay published last week, was "disgraceful" and not an apt description of the English population in Scotland or its contribution to Scottish society.
Gray, author of Lanark, has said he is not anti-English but that he was describing how although some English settle in Scotland and are "as much a part of Scotland as Asian restaurateurs", colonists "look forward to a future back in England through promotion or by retirement".
Gray, who made the comments in an essay in a book called Unstated: Writers on Scottish Independence, said the ensuing row had left him mystified.
However Mr Devine said that not only was the language inappropriate, but ignored the contributions made to Scottish culture by the English, as well as ignoring the contribution made to the British Empire, and its own history of colonialism, by Scots.
Mr Devine said the last census showed there were 420,000 first generation English in Scotland.
He added: "I think [Mr Gray shows] a disgraceful attitude. We have got to remember that the current Scottish population is so vibrant because of the English factor."
Mr Gray's comments were reported the day before The Herald published an interview with the departing artistic director of the National Theatre of Scotland, Vicky Featherstone, who said a period of anti-English "bullying" – criticial comments which focused on her Englishness – had led to a brief crisis in her tenure.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article