Venezuelan politicians have voted to postpone the inauguration of ailing President Hugo Chavez for his new term, prompting complaints from opponents who called it a violation of the constitution.
Mr Chavez's congressional allies, who hold a majority of seats in the National Assembly, agreed with a government proposal for Mr Chavez to be sworn in at a later date before the Supreme Court.
While pro-Chavez politicians approved the plan, opponents condemned the action as illegal.
Vice President Nicolas Maduro broke the news that Mr Chavez would not be able to attend today's scheduled inauguration in a letter to National Assembly President Diosdado Cabello, confirming suspicions that Mr Chavez's battle with cancer and a related respiratory infection would keep him in a Cuban hospital.
Mr Maduro said Mr Chavez was invoking a provision in the constitution allowing him to be sworn in at a "later date".
The opposition disputed that argument and appealed to the Organisation of American States.
Tensions between the government and opposition have been building for days in the dispute over whether the ailing president's swearing-in can legally be postponed. The president underwent his fourth cancer-related surgery in Cuba last month.
Opposition leader Henrique Capriles has said Mr Chavez's current term constitutionally ends today and the Supreme Court should rule in the matter.
Other opposition leaders have argued the inauguration cannot legally be put off, saying the National Assembly president should take over as interim president if Mr Chavez has not returned from Cuba on inauguration day.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article