The Scottish Information Commissioner has backtracked on her decision to force Scottish ministers to name the salmon farms that shoot seals to stop them eating fish.
In a rare move, Rosemary Agnew has reopened her investigation into the issue because of new allegations from salmon netters, who also shoot seals. They claim to have had threats from animal welfare groups, including a death threat.
Agnew has now given ministers until the end of the month to provide hard evidence of the risks to property and people. She will then consider whether to enforce her decision, which originally demanded seal-shooting salmon farms be identified by January 10.
Her change of heart was due to the "seriousness of the concerns raised", according to an email last week from her office to the Global Alliance Against Industrial Aquaculture (GAAIA), which had asked for the sites to be named under freedom of information law.
The Sunday Herald revealed on December 2 that Agnew had dismissed the Scottish Government's arguments for continued secrecy as "tenuous". Ministers had failed to provide sufficient evidence to back up fears that shooters could be endangered, she said.
But now she is giving them a second chance to make their case. She has been told by the Salmon Net Fishing Association of Scotland that identifying shooting sites "will materially affect the safety of our members and could potentially result in significant harm to them personally, or to the equipment."
GAAIA's Don Staniford said the Scottish Government was "desperately squirming off the hook". It smells "decidedly fishy", he claimed. "It appears illogical and unreasonable that a last-minute complaint by netsmen has any bearing at all in relation to a freedom of information request on salmon farms."
Agnew's U-turn has also been challenged by John Robins, secretary of the Save Our Seals Fund. He found it "extremely difficult" to accept the netters' concerns, as the only details that would be released would be historic and would not identify individuals.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article