A mother who received state benefits has been awarded a £250,000 palimony payout against her former partner after a court battle.
Jacqueline Whigham launched a legal action against businessman Steven Owen for a share of the wealth after the break-up of their relationship.
The couple lived together for more than 26 years but at the end of their cohabitation Mr Owen had significant assets of nearly £747,000 while she had assets of just more than £10,000.
But a judge ruled that Mr Owen should pay a capital sum of £250,000 to his former partner and said: "This is a particularly deserving case."
Lord Drummond Young, at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, said: "The pursuer [Ms Whigham] made very substantial contributions, both financial and non-financial, to the family and the defender [Mr Owen] unquestionably benefited from these.
"At the same time, she was unable to develop any career of her own. To that extent she has been disadvantaged."
The judge said Ms Whigham had made substantial contributions to the running of the household and to Mr Owen's business activities. Mr Owen had worked in plumbing, drain cleaning, property development and the hotel business.
The judge said that must be compensated under the terms of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 which legislates for financial provision following the break-up of cohabitation.
Lord Drummond Young said: "In my opinion that must be reflected in a substantial award. The business provided the family with a good livelihood. They lived in a large house, they enjoyed foreign holidays and the children were able to participate in a range of leisure activities that were dependent on the family's having a reasonably good income."
He noted Mr Owen was able to fly a private aircraft as a hobby.
He said Ms Whigham now lives in a rented local authority house in Penicuik, Midlothian, and has tried to secure work as a cleaner and childminder, but due to her depression was unable to maintain that. He said: "She would like to obtain sufficient funds to put down a deposit on a house and run her own arts and crafts business."
Lord Drummond Young said Mr Owen still lived in the former family home at Spittal House, Ninemileburn, described as "a substantial property with five bedrooms", after the couple split at the start of 2011.
The judge said: "His present income from the Dial-a-Rod business in the last year for which figures are available was in excess of £54,000."
Ms Whigham, a former commis chef, had sought a payment in excess of £350,000 as a half-share of the assets when they stopped living together, with Mr Owen submitting she was entitled to nothing.
At one stage she had worked long hours cooking, cleaning and making beds at Habbie Howie's Hotel, at Ninemileburn – run as a business by a partnership of Mr Owen and his brother. She said she was paid £15 a week.
It was argued on behalf of Mr Owen the assets he had when the cohabitation ended derived not from anything Ms Whigham did, but from his partnership with his brother, who possessed considerable business ability, and from his own hard work.
Lord Drummond Young said: "I decline to hold that the pursuer made no economic contribution to the businesses; indeed, the evidence very clearly indicated the contrary."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article