When these allegations were first made, the mood among many Scottish Catholics was one of shock and disbelief.
How could a Prince of the Church who had been involved in the election of one Pope and might have been an elector in the forthcoming conclave possibly be guilty of such charges? Suspicions were rife about the possible motivations of the accusers.
Now we know the truth. The mood is likely to change radically to one of anger and a deep sense of betrayal. Christian charity demands we condemn the sin and not the sinner but the hypocrisy that runs through this story leaves a bitter taste. Successive promotions to the highest honour the Catholic Church can bestow, apart from that of the papacy itself, were accepted without demur. Homosexual behaviour was unrelentingly denounced in the media despite the fact that, as now admitted, "... my sexual conduct has fallen below the standards expected of me as a priest, archbishop and cardinal". People will find it difficult to accept that level of hypocrisy. The enemies of the Church are rejoicing today.
I have already said in a previous comment that this was potentially the gravest internal scandal to hit the Catholic Church in Scotland since the Reformation, with incalculable effects in the short run. The only word that I would now change is "potentially".
Nevertheless, I am reasonably confident this awful episode will not shake the faith of committed Catholics. The Church is made up of the people of God, not of episcopal hierarchies – no matter how eminent.
In the meantime, the faithful in Scotland owe an enormous debt of gratitude to the priests and former priest who had the personal courage to bring all of this into the public domain.
The pain caused by this episode will be profound, but better that than concealing the truth.
l Tom Devine is professor in history and director of the Scottish Centre of Diaspora Studies at Edinburgh University.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article