CONSERVATIVE leader Ruth Davidson is expected to back a commission this week that will examine new powers for Holyrood, a move that has attracted a backlash from senior party members.
Davidson, who won the leadership on the back of opposing greater devolution, will instead signal that she favours a rethink of the Parliament's powers.
However, Lord Forsyth, who was a key supporter of Davidson, said the timing of the speech was a "bit odd" and that it was a "cop out" to focus on extra powers.
Davidson stood for the Scottish Conservative leadership in 2011 on a pledge to draw a "line in the sand" on devolution, and opposed Holyrood getting more powers.
Her defence of the status quo was a riposte to her main rival, Murdo Fraser, whose radical pitch to activists was to wind up the Scottish Tories, form a new centre-right party and embrace more powers.
Forsyth, whose support for Davidson during the bitter leadership contest was seen as pivotal, is sceptical of a rethink on more powers.
The peer told the Sunday Herald a commission should look at the unresolved issues created by devolution, such as the Barnett Formula and the so-called West Lothian Question.
He said: "I think it's a real cop out for people in the Holyrood bubble to talk about powers, when they should be talking what they are doing with their existing powers."
He added: "I have to say that the timing [of the speech] is a bit odd.... it does seem something of a diversion to be arguing about more powers for the Scottish Parliament, when what is at issue is whether the Scottish Parliament should have the powers of an independent country."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article