A PUBLIC inquiry will be triggered if councillors reject proposals today for a controversial SSE wind farm in the Highlands.
The Scottish energy giant is looking to construct 83 turbines in the Monadhliath Mountains, between the A9 and Loch Ness, as pressure grows on the Highland Council to throw out the plans at a meeting.
If the council rejects the plan at Stronelairg, near SSE's Glendoe Hydro Scheme, it will trigger the inquiry before ministers make the final decision.
Planners have recommended councillors do not oppose the development if the plan is reduced to 67 turbines. SSE, which was last week fined £10.5m by the regulator Ofgem for mis-selling gas and electricity, has indicated it will accept the reduction.
But Scottish Natural Heritage is against the plan, citing its impact on wild land and the wider landscape. The site is close to Cairngorms National Park's boundary and its authority has objected too.
Helen McDade, head of policy at conservation charity the John Muir Trust, said: "The Stronelairg development would be spread across a core area of wild land larger than the city of Inverness, with turbines higher than the Forth Road Bridge."
She urged councillors on the planning committee to act consistently with the council's recent decision to object to the Dalnessie and Glenmorie developments to the north of the Great Glen.
"It would be irrational for Glenmorie and Dalnessie wind farms to be subject to a public local inquiry, while Stronelairg, which is larger than both of these combined, is allowed to go through without any public scrutiny," she aid.
David Gibson, the Mountaineering Council of Scotland's chief officer, agreed: "It is a critical day for the Scottish mountains and Highland councillors have it in their power to send a strong message to the big power companies."
SSE said the Stronelairg wind farm was located in one of the Highland Council's search areas for wind farms, was sensitively sited around significant Hydro-electric infrastructure and was not visible from any of the main tourist routes in the region.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article