UKIP leader Nigel Farage appears to have got over his high-profile public confrontation in Edinburgh two weeks ago and plans to come to Scotland soon to campaign in the by-election for the Holyrood seat of Aberdeen Donside.
"My intention is to go; it's just a question of what I have to cancel to do so," he said.
Otto Inglis, an Edinburgh-based businessman, is the Ukip candidate. The SNP's Mark McDonald is favourite to win the seat where his colleague, Brian Adam, whose death sparked the by-election, took more than 55% of the vote in 2011 with a majority of 7175.
Mr Farage also intends to travel to Orkney and Shetland, where the party has a "solid branch", in August. A party spokesman said the constituency voted against membership of the EEC in the 1970s and opposed Scottish devolution in the 1999 referendum.
Earlier this month, the Ukip leader blamed "racist" and "anti-English" independence supporters for disrupting a party event in the Scottish capital.
The First Minister, Alex Salmond, responded by saying: "We can frankly do without Ukip, who dislike everybody and know absolutely nothing about Scotland."
Mr Farage described this as "an extraordinary comment", which contained "not just a bit of fear". He likened Nationalism to alcohol, saying "excess leads to deep unpleasantness".
A Ukip spokesman also described Mr Salmond as having a "messianic complex" and claimed his failure to condemn the verbal abuse of Mr Farage showed "not strength but weakness".
He said: "Why was Salmond so angry with Farage? To suggest because Nigel comes from Kent that he is not welcome in Scotland is an argument in the extreme. He is angry because Ukip turned up and is serious about Scotland. Salmond fears we speak for a significant proportion of the population."
While the anti-EU party generally polls badly in Scotland, the spokesman insisted Ukip's basic pro-UK and anti-EU message was backed by 20% of Scots, the same as or better than the level of support for the pro-UK, pro-EU Better Together campaign.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article