MSPs do not know if there is enough money to pay for the Scottish Government's ambition to teach three languages from primary school age, a committee has concluded.
The government wants children to learn a second language from primary 1 and a third language no later than primary 5, the so-called 1+2 approach.
A lack of language skills costs the economy more than £500 million a year, the SNP administration estimates.
It has allocated £4m for its languages fund but this has been described as "a drop in the ocean" by headteachers.
There is insufficient information to assess whether this funding is enough to implement 1+2 in schools, Holyrood's European and External Affairs Committee concluded in a new report.
Convener Christina McKelvie, an SNP MSP, said: "We have found it hard to assess whether this funding is adequate as it is still not known what the current levels of skills and resources for language learning in schools are."
She added: "We are recommending that local authorities ensure one language is taught continuously from primary to secondary schools. This will help develop competency and can feed into the local job market more productively."
The Association of Headteachers and Deputes in Scotland told the committee the £4m is just "a drop in the ocean", while the Government's own Languages Working Group thinks two to three times that amount would be required.
The report states: "The committee does not feel that it has sufficient information to determine whether the funding allocated by the Scottish Government is sufficient or not."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article