Tom Watson's resignation marks the second time he has left a high-profile job in a blaze of publicity.
In his letter to Ed Miliband yesterday, he referenced the notorious occasion when he walked out of his post as a defence minister in Tony Blair's government in 2006, claiming that it was not in the "interest of either the party or the country" for the Prime Minister to stay on in office until 2007.
That move was widely seen as an orchestrated attempt by Gordon Brown's supporters to put their man in Downing Street early.
Soon after, he was forced to defend a visit he made to Mr Brown's Scotland home shortly before his resignation, saying he had merely been delivering a present for the then chancellor's baby.
Yesterday he said some within the party "have not forgiven me" for that act.
There was little surprise when he joined Mr Brown's government, in charge of digital policy at the Cabinet Office.
In the early years in opposition he was a dogged pursuer of the truth over phone hacking.
In the Commons Culture Committee he played a key role in grilling Rupert Murdoch and his son James when the hacking allegations proved correct.
He was invited by Ed Miliband to return to the front bench to co-ordinate election campaigning.
But there have been grumblings for months that he refused to accept the collective responsibility that came with the role. Instead he pursued a number of issues which he said yesterday he would continue to campaign on from the backbenchers, including on the use of drones.
The MP for West Bromwich East since 2001, he is known to have a vast array of cultural interests including music, film and video games. One piece of advice for Mr Miliband was to make sure he had a "real life" and to listen to the band Drenge.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article