A SCOTTISH Government proposal to provide a named person for every child has been questioned by the professional body for solicitors.
The plan could interfere with families' right to respect for private and family life, and amounts to disproportionate state interference, potentially conflicting with human rights, according to the Law Society of Scotland.
The measure could also cause practical problems, with staff and services in areas such as social work, health and education being diverted away from where they are most needed, the society says.
Assigning a named person for every child from birth until 18 is proposed in the Children and Young People (Scotland) Bill.
The named person, such as a social worker or teacher, would be responsible for safeguarding the child's welfare and liaising with the family.
In its written evidence to Holyrood's Education and Culture Committee, the society argues the provisions could conflict with article eight of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Morag Driscoll, convener of the society's Family Law Committee, said: "The proposals could interfere with article eight of ECHR, the right to respect for private and family life, as there is scope for interference between the role of the 'named person' and the exercise of a parent's rights and responsibilities. It could be interpreted as disproportionate state interference."
A Government spokeswoman said: "We are confident the proposed legislation is compliant with European law."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article