SCOTLAND'S universities could create an effective replacement if they were forced to leave their present UK-wide pension scheme, according to a leading firm of actuarial experts.
Pension consultants Xafinity said Scots universities may have to quit the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) if Scotland became independent.
However, a briefing by the firm said creating a separate Scottish scheme would incur only relatively modest additional costs, and concluded: "A Scottish USS would have sufficient scale to manage assets and liabilities in as effective a way as they have been in the past."
Last month, Labour's pensions spokesman Gregg McClymont warned university pensions would be at risk if Scotland became independent.
Under EU rules, "cross-border" occupational pension schemes must be fully funded, with sufficient assets to cover their liabilities. The USS - which has 36,000 members in Scotland - has a shortfall of £9.8 billion.
But Xafinity said claims of a crisis were unnecessarily alarmist, adding that workarounds to the problem included creating a Scottish USS or allowing individual universities to put assets into other existing schemes.
The USS could also meet EU rules by plugging its £9.8bn funding gap, it said.
First Minister Alex Salmond again sought to reassure defined benefit pension scheme members yesterday, insisting it was nonsense to present the issue as a "great immovable problem".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article