Home Secretary Theresa May has been accused of a cover-up after she used legal powers to keep parts of a critical inspection into UK border controls secret.
Fifteen sections of the report into controls between France and the UK have been redacted - including part of a passage revealing staff and managers fear resources in Calais are stretched - for national security reasons.
Politicians and campaigners have accused Mrs May of hiding "her own failings" exposed in the report by chief inspector of borders and immigration John Vine.
Chris Bryant, shadow immigration minister, said: "This cover-up and the failure at our borders provide yet more dents in this Government's much-tarnished credibility."
In unredacted sections of the report, Mr Vine warns thousands of illegal immigrants attempting to sneak into the UK through France have not been fingerprinted by border officials for nearly four years.
The report reveals Border Force - the Home Office law enforcement wing stationed at ports and airports - is fining drivers and firms guilty of bringing in illegal immigrants at way below the maximum allowed by law.
Mr Vine reveals border staff remain concerned over the effect of the so-called Lille loophole, which effectively exempts some passengers who travel to Britain via Lille, in France, on Eurostar trains boarded in Brussels, Belgium, from UK Border Force immigration checks.
A Home Office spokesman said: "In accordance with the UK Borders Act 2007 the Home Secretary, in consultation with the independent chief inspector, is required to redact any material which, if published, would be prejudicial to the interests of national security."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article