WORKERS at a Scottish council are preparing to take industrial action in a row over claims they have been offered a 1.5% pay cut and asked to work an extra hour a week.
Unison Stirling Council Branch, along with the other trade unions at the local authority, said the action was likely to take place following a rejection of the Council's final proposals for "draconian" cuts in pay and conditions.
Branch secretary James Douglas said: "The council met us today but we are unclear why as they made it clear within a few minutes that they were not prepared to change anything."
David O'Connor, Regional Organiser for Unison, said: "What the employer is effectively proposing is a 4.5% pay cut for the majority of employees.
"The chief executive's offer for staff to work the equivalent of an extra seven days to reduce the pay cut to 1.5% does not detract from the fact the proposed cuts are nothing less than draconian."
Action could be taken by the end of the month over the offer, which Unison said actually amounted to a 4.5% pay cut.
The proposal was made despite council workers across Scotland narrowly voting to accept a 1% pay rise on Wednesday.
The Labour council needs to cut £9 million from its budget this year and £24m over the next four years.
The 3300 employees accounting for half its spending leaving man- agers facing a choice of compulsory redundancies or changing the staff's contractural terms and conditions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article