EXPERTS will travel to Syria imminently to investigate claims of chemical weapons use during that country's civil war after the United Nations and the Syrian government agreed on details of the trip.
The UN said two weeks ago that Syrian President Bashar Assad's government had agreed to let the inspectors, led by Swedish scientist Ake Sellstrom, travel to three sites where chemical weapons were reported to have been used.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said the Syrian government had formally agreed to the mission. He added: "The departure of the team is now imminent. The team will remain in the country to conduct its activities, including on-site visits, for a period of up to 14 days, extendable upon mutual consent."
One site to be visited by the UN experts is Khan al Assal in Aleppo, where the Syrian government says rebels used chemical weapons in March. The other two locations have not yet been identified.
Rebels seized Khan al Assal from Assad's forces last month. The opposition Syrian National Coalition has told Mr Ban it would co-operate with the chemical weapons inquiry and welcome UN investigators into all territories under our control.
The UN said it has received 13 reports of possible chemical weapons use - one from Syria's government and the rest mainly from Britain, France and the United States.
The US concluded in June that Assad's forces used chemical weapons against rebel fighters.
President Barack Obama said last year any attempt to deploy or use chemical or biological weapons in Syria would cross a red line.
Syria is one of seven countries that have not joined the 1997 convention banning chemical weapons.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article