UNION leaders have called on Scottish ministers to bar companies which use zero-hours contracts from tendering for publicly funded work.
Firms which guarantee neither work nor pay should not benefit from lucrative public sector contracts, the Unite union has said in a letter to Scottish Finance Secretary John Swinney.
Last month, Scottish ministers suggested that they could ban companies which use the controversial terms from the tendering process.
The move followed reports that there are one million zero-hours jobs in the UK.
Councils, universities and high street chains across Scotland have all admitted using the contracts.
Unite pointed to recent revelations that zero-hour contracts are being used by sub-contractors on the £300 publicly-funded Borders Rail Link.
The Herald also revealed that the Church of Scotland's social care arm, Crossreach, is employing hundreds of staff on the terms.
Unite Scottish Secretary Pat Rafferty said: "Zero-hours contracts are a disgraceful employment practice that leaves workers in limbo - people don't know if they have a job or income from one day to the next.
"The Scottish Government condemns employment rights abuses like zero-hours contracts but also says it's for the UK Government to sort out. While it's true they can't end these practices, they do have the power to create minimum standards that all companies must adhere to when tendering for public contracts."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "Employment policy is currently reserved to Westminster. However, we are actively considering whether issues around the use of zero-hour contracts can form a legitimate consideration for a public body as part of the public procurement process."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article