A prison officer spoke of his relief after a jury decided he was not responsible for the death of an intoxicated elderly man who walked in front of his car.
Grant Forrester was driving past the 1314 pub, in Whins of Milton, Stirling, when Thomas Graham, 75, who had been drinking inside, stepped in front of his car.
Mr Graham, a married father-of-two, with three grandchildren, from Stirling, had a blood-alcohol count equivalent to having drunk 16 single measures of whisky.
Mr Forrester, 45, had been driving his Renault Megane on the A872 through Whins of Milton well within the 30mph speed limit.
His defence counsel Shelagh McCall told jurors at Falkirk Sheriff Court it was beyond doubt Mr Graham was intoxicated to a level at which his judgment and assessment of risk could be affected.
She added: "There is also no doubt that at some point Mr Graham walked on to the carriageway, directly in the path of Mr Forrester's car." Mr Graham died from his injuries two days later in Forth Valley Royal Hospital, on November 18, 2011.
After a trial lasting five days, and three hours' deliberation, the jury found Mr Forrester, of South Scotstoun, South Queensferry, not guilty of causing death by careless driving.
The prosecution had claimed he had "failed to keep a proper look-out".
As the verdict was read out, members of Mr Forrester's family broke down in tears of joy and hugged each other, while Mr Forrester, now a warder at Cornton Vale women's prison, Stirling, sighed with relief.
Outside court, Mr Forrester said: "I just want to go home now," before leaving with his family.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article