An independent commission should be set up "to end decades of drift and delay on major infrastructure decisions", a report commissioned by the Labour Party has said.
The report, from Sir John Armitt who chaired the Olympic Delivery Authority, found that there has been a lack of long-term strategic planning, with successive governments failing to set priorities based on future needs.
Major infrastructure projects "are often controversial and politicians are rarely in office long enough to see the electoral dividends of major investment programmes" it added.
Problems surrounding the planning and implementing of schemes had affected energy policy, airport capacity, road and rail schemes and water projects.
The report went on: "The Office for National Statistics, for example, forecasts UK population will grow to over 73 million people by 2035.
"However, there is little evidence governments are planning for the infrastructure we will need by then to support another 10 million people."
Commissioned by Labour leader Ed Miliband and Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls last year, the report called for a new independent National Infrastructure Commission to be established.
The commission - appointed by Government and opposition parties -would identify the UK's long-term infrastructure needs and monitor the plans developed by governments to meet them.
The report suggested such a commission would also consider how the UK's future needs could be met in a targeted and efficient manner with value for money being a key factor.
It called for a new approach to prepare the country for major challenges in future, such as population growth and climate change.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article