RADICAL proposals for Scottish schools to develop their most talented pupils using money from philanthropists have been attacked by a leading academic.
Brian Boyd, emeritus professor of education at Strathclyde University, in Glasgow, said the suggestion was "misconceived" and "out of kilter" with the notion of a Common Weal.
The attack came after another prominent Scottish academic published a paper, commissioned by the Scottish Government, on whether greater use could be made of private money in education.
Lindsay Paterson, Professor of Education at Edinburgh University, suggested the setting up of a National Lottery-style fund to which state and private schools could bid for bursaries on behalf of pupils excelling in disciplines such as music, dance, sport, languages, mathematics, science, writing and leadership.
The proposal also covers donors of larger sums of money who would be allowed to fund particular schemes directly.
Professor Paterson said the ultimate purpose was a change to Scotland's educational culture so that it would have the reputation "not only of providing opportunities for everyone, but, also, once more, of fostering true individual excellence."
However Professor Boyd said there were far better ways of using philanthropic money than on "elitist schemes" to benefit a minority of pupils, adding: "There is no place for vanity projects in our education system."
Eileen Prior, executive director of the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, said families were also likely to have strong views about the purpose of such giving.
"Commercial involvement in schools is a difficult and emotive area because not every parent will agree with the nature of the business or the benefits the companies look for," she said.
"It seems likely that philanthropy in schools is likely to touch some of the same issues.
"This is not charitable, anonymous giving - it is funding for specific projects or activities and, as such, we imagine parents will have strong views about the source of any funding, its purpose and the influence such funders are likely to expect in return."
However, Liz Smith, education spokeswoman for the Scottish Conservatives, said: "The paper is both radical and timely.
"It correctly identifies that success in Scottish schools, whether in the private or public sectors, owes much to several generations of philanthropists."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article