David Cameron faces a fresh back-bench challenge to his EU policy after a Tory MP said he would push for a Commons vote on holding an in/out referendum before the general election.
Number 10 slapped down Adam Afriyie's plan to table an amendment to legislation paving the way for a promised vote in 2017, insisting it would not be allowed to pass "in any circumstances".
"The PM will not let it stand," a spokesman said.
The Windsor MP said the public was "not convinced" that the Prime Minister would stick to his pledge of a vote if the Conservatives win the general election.
Writing in a national newspaper, Mr Afriyie said delaying posed "significant dangers", including building support for the UK Independence Party (Ukip), a serious concern for many colleagues and activists.
And he claimed the support of "many MPs across all the main parties" for an early referendum.
But he was warned by the fellow Tory MP attempting to steer the leadership-backed legislation through Parliament that the move would delay and even "kill" his private member's bill altogether.
James Wharton said: "This amendment would make it far more difficult to navigate the challenging procedural hurdles we need to overcome and I hope its sponsors might rethink their approach.
"We need to build as broad a base of support for the bill as we can if we are to get it through Parliament."
Meanwhile, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg will say the EU referendum promise is "deeply flawed and bound to unravel." In one of his most strident attacks yet, the LibDem leader will say no renegotiation could ever satisfy Tory eurosceptics hell bent on an exit from Brussels that would be "economic suicide" for the UK and derail the recovery.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article