LABOUR'S energy price freeze has been branded "a gimmick" by David Cameron, as Ed Miliband accused the Coalition of having "no answer" to his pledge.
The Prime Minister claimed at Prime Minister's Questions the Labour leader's promise of a 20-month freeze in energy prices was undeliverable because no government could control wholesale energy markets.
In robust exchanges, Mr Cameron said if Mr Miliband did introduce the price freeze, it would only lead to higher energy costs for households and businesses in the long term.
"This isn't a policy, it's a gimmick," declared the PM.
He told the Labour leader: "The reason it's a gimmick is that you are in favour of a decarbonisation target that would add £125 to everybody's bill. Now it is obvious why you want to talk about the cost of living because you do not have an economic policy any more.
"Isn't it the case that what you are promising is a price increase before a promise, a broken promise, and then a price increase after a promise? One price increase, one broken promise, another price increase. That sounds like every Labour government since the war."
But Mr Miliband hit back, accusing Mr Cameron of having no answer to Labour's energy freeze policy, unveiled at last month's party's conference.
Mr Miliband argued that the UK Government's policy to help consumers switch to the lowest energy tariff would not help 90% of the population whereas his policy would benefit 27m households and 2.4m businesses across the country.
"What is clear," insisted Mr Miliband, "is that you are floundering around and you have no answer to Labour's energy price freeze.
"You didn't even defend your own policy, which won't benefit 90% of the country. You have no idea. You say you want to bring energy prices down but can you confirm that energy prices have gone up by £300 since you became Prime Minister?"
Mr Cameron said that energy prices had doubled under Labour.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article