A school building project that is expected to cost nearly four times its original value has become the focus of a row in the Dunfermline by-election.
Fife Council will pay back £412 million over the next 20 years for schools built in the last decade which had a capital value of £103.9 million, according to UK Treasury figures.
The contracts were signed by a former Labour council administration in 2003, and financed through the former Labour/Liberal Democrat Scottish Executive's preferred private finance initiative (PFI) model which spread the payments to private-sector contractors over decades at an additional cost. The SNP commissioned a review of the projects during its term in power in Fife in 2011 which found that projects "did indicate value for money and affordability".
With a by-election looming to replace disgraced former SNP MSP Bill Walker, the cost of school building in Fife has returned to the fore.
SNP candidate Shirley-Anne Somerville has described the £412 million bill as "disastrous", but her Labour opponent Cara Hilton has questioned why the SNP approved a report which labelled them as "value for money".
Ms Somerville said: "Under the SNP administration, schools were built in Dunfermline without a penny of PFI/PPP debt.
Ms Hilton said: "This is a remarkable attack from the SNP. "Their own review showed these buildings provided value for money. Not one SNP councillor objected to that conclusion."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article