US senators have expressed hope a bipartisan deal could emerge to end Washington's fiscal crisis even as Republicans in the House of Representatives said they were working on a separate plan.
If Democrats and Republicans agree, it could be today before the US Senate signs off on a plan, close to tomorrow's deadline when the Obama administration says it will reach its borrowing limit and risk default.
Republicans in the House of Representatives were last night discussing an alternative plan that includes measures that would affect President Barack Obama's healthcare reforms, which have been at the heart of the crisis.
But Arkansas Democrat Mark Pryor said: "I think we'll get an agreement today in the Senate.
"I'm not saying we can pass it today because there's logistics about drafting and getting it to the floor but my guess is we'll pass something in the Senate tomorrow."
"There's a lot of work that's going to be done over the next two or three days," Republican Senator Bob Corker said but he cautioned it was too early to be sure of a deal.
Congressional sources said the two sides in the Senate were still at odds over Democrats' demand for a delay in an insurance fee that is part of the new healthcare reforms.
Thursday is the deadline for raising the debt ceiling to extend the government's borrowing authority. The Obama administration says it will be unable to pay all of its bills if Congress does not raise the $16.7 trillion debt limit by then.
The federal government has been in partial shutdown since October 1 when Congress missed the deadline for funding it.
Conservative Republicans prompted the crisis, which has rattled global markets, by demanding major changes to the healthcare reforms as a condition of passing a government spending bill and raising the debt ceiling.
One senior Senate aide said that, under the Senate plan being negotiated, the Treasury Department would maintain its ability to use extraordinary measures to manage debt payments if a February 2014 deadline for raising US borrowing authority is missed.
Mr Pryor and Mr Corker both said their concerns focused on fellow Republicans in the House, where conservatives who are starting to hear about the terms of the Senate agreement were already expressing scepticism, spurred on by conservative organisations.
The tentative Senate agreement does not defund or delay Obamacare, but some Senate Republicans are seeking minor changes such as tougher income verification for those seeking insurance subsidies under the law and delay to a so-called reinsurance fee.
In the last few days talks have been led by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, and his Republican counterpart, Mitch McConnell. Mr Obama telephoned McConnell on Monday evening but neither the White House nor McConnell's office gave details.
Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat who is part of a bipartisan group of senators trying to forge a compromise, said an agreement would buy time for a more thoughtful process to settle longer-term budget issues.
The deal would reopen the federal government, pay US bills and allow the parties to commit to further negotiate, she said, adding: Those are the bright spots."
Polls show Republicans have taken a hit in opinion polls since the standoff began. A Washington Post/ABC News poll released on Monday found 74% of Americans disapprove of the way congressional Republicans have handled the standoff, compared with a 53% disapproval rating for Mr Obama.
A survey released by Gallup yesterday showed Americans' confidence in the US economy fell five points last week as the government shutdown continued.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article