The Penrose Inquiry has heard emotional testimonies on the impact of the contaminated blood from victims and their families, given anonymously at closed hearings in 2011.
One witness, a haemophiliac using only the name "Mark", told the inquiry how he had been infected with HIV and hepatitis C after being treated at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary in 1984, when he was 13. He said medics did not tell him that he had contracted the condition for seven years.
He said: "They knew I was HIV positive and had hepatitis C but kept quiet. They've taken my life away from me. When they finally told me I was open-mouthed in disbelief. My life has been ruined."
The inquiry also heard from "Elaine", whose husband died in 1992, six years after he was diagnosed with HIV as a result of a blood transfusion at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary.
She said she had lived for two years with the infection before being told by doctors.
"This scandal has taken a soulmate, a great father and a loving grandfather from us. This should never have happened and should never be allowed to happen again," she said.
The inquiry into the outbreak of clostridium difficile at the Vale of Leven hospital, which infected 55 patients between December 2007 and June 2008, also heard evidence from witnesses.
Michelle Stewart, who helped set up the C-Diff Justice Group, said the hospital was unable to give basic personal care to her mother-in-law, Sarah McGinty, 67, who died on February 1 2008.
She told the inquiry: "One of the big questions we've got is why an infection was allowed to run rampant for six months without detection?"
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article