SCOTLAND's two largest councils have criticised the Government over its plan of action to tackle climate change, in another blow to Holyrood's green policy.
Glasgow and Edinburgh city councils said they were disappointed the Climate Change Adaptation Programme consultation failed to address key areas including who would pay for preparations to cope with global warming.
The consultation found the "over-arching aim" of the plans to make Scotland ready for the fall-out from climate change had been widely welcomed by a range of correspondents, including councils and environmental bodies.
But some local authorities said lack of detail on funding was a critical omission, while environment quangos raised concerns over the impact of coastal erosion and fears that city centre pollution and urban temperature hot-spots had been overlooked.
Action plans are being formulated to help deal with health effects of climate change and the impact on businesses, as more severe weather patterns could bring cold winters that would affect older people, and warmer weather lead to new illnesses.
One example might involve training farmers on how to introduce different crops if climate change affected traditional crop growing.
Floods, new pests and diseases and migration - as people move to higher ground - could have significant effects on Scottish society and its economy, according to government findings.
Glasgow City Council, a Labour-led administration, said in its response to the consultation: "There are some good ideas and some valuable policies but, overall it seems a short-term plan, rather than the flexible, long-term approach that Scotland will need if it is to successfully become a 'climate-ready nation'.
"Simply identifying action planned or proposed in the next five years will not be sufficient."
Edinburgh City Council, which is a Labour/SNP coalition, responded: "The role of local government in adaptation needs to be better emphasised.
"The City of Edinburgh Council is a major player and, as such, significant funding will be required to fulfil the conditions of the adaptation programme.
"There is no mention of how actions in the programme will be funded. Climate change impacts will place immense strains on public sector budgets."
The Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (Cosla) said: "Understanding the risk of flooding does not ensure that action is taken to mitigate the risk. For the most part this requires financial input."
A Scottish Government spokesman said it was "showing leadership" on the issue. He added: "All responses to the public consultation on the draft programme will be taken into consideration."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article