THE GMB union faces a backlash from some of its members over the decision to endorse a No vote in the independence referendum.
Jim Moody, senior shop steward at Scottish Borders Council, said the move by Scotland's third biggest trade union organisation had been a "betrayal and a disgraceful stitch-up."
Mr Moody, a member for more than 20 years who represents more than 200 members locally, said: "I have spoken to other shop stewards and GMB members and we are incandescent.
"The union leadership has absolutely no right to take this action. To say we have been consulted is a falsehood, pure and simple.
"There has certainly been no consultation in this part of the world. The first I heard about this was when I saw it on Facebook."
There was widespread complaint on social media yesterday from some GMB activists claiming that they had not been consulted as part of the exercise which then led to the union's decision to put its weight behind a No vote.
No one from the union responded to the complaint last night but the announcement at the weekend claimed full consultation had been carried out.
Mr Moody, an SNP activist, insisted: "This decision has not been endorsed by the membership and it makes absolutely no sense. The union leadership has taken a hugely important and controversial decision without having any of the hard facts about what a Yes vote will mean.
"How can they possibly come to a judgment on independence without waiting for the Scottish Government's White Paper on the subject, which is due out later this month and will give us a full picture?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article