A government minister caught up in a row over freedom of speech in the independence debate has said she would never try to stifle debate.
Shona Robison, a Dundee MSP, released a statement stating her position following claims that she questioned the impartiality of Professor Chris Whatley, a Dundee University historian who is involved in a project to investigate issues raised by the referendum.
It emerged last week that he appeared at a pro-UK Better Together event, prompting Ms Robison to ask whether his views are compatible with the neutrality of the university's 5 Million Questions project.
She emailed the university principal Professor Pete Downes on November 4 to voice her concerns and say she thought Professor Whatley should remain neutral as he is a "figurehead" of the project.
Her intervention attracted an angry response from opposition parties and led to an open letter from leading academics worried about freedom of speech.
First Minister Alex Salmond was challenged by Conservative leader Ruth Davidson to condemn any intimidation during exchanges at Holyrood on Thursday.
He said: "The accusation is total and utter nonsense. The words 'intimidation' and 'Shona Robison' don't sit easily together
Today Ms Robison, the Commonwealth Games and Sport Minister, set out her position in a statement on her website.
She wrote: "Firstly, I am very happy to endorse the First Minister's support for Professor Chris Whatley's chairmanship of the project, and his right to participate in the launch of Better Together in Dundee. My concern was only ever about the perceived neutrality of the project itself, something it heavily stressed in its foundation statement - all of which is perfectly clear from the email I sent to Professor Pete Downes, principal of Dundee University."
She went on: "Secondly, I actually agree with the academics who wrote...on Saturday that it is better if we know the views of people participating in the debate, and then everyone is in a position to view their contribution in that light. I would never try to stifle debate or attempt to restrict the right of anyone, whether an academic or not, to have a view in the debate on Scotland's future."
Her statement concluded: "I believe that a fully informed debate best serves Scotland's referendum, and indeed the achievement of a Yes vote. I welcome open and diverse public debate on Scotland's constitutional future - engaging our academic community among many others is an important part of that process."
Ms Robison also published the email she sent to Professor Downes, in which she wrote: "I'm aware that individuals involved in 5 million questions may sit on either side of the debate and I have no problem with that, however Prof Whatley's position is somewhat different as he is the figurehead of the organisation and should in my opinion have remained neutral."
Professor Downes said: "I think it's laid out quite clearly on Shona Robison's website that what Shona Robison emailed me about was to ask whether or not Professor Whatley's role in a Better Together event represented a conflict with his role leading our 5 million questions events on the referendum which prides themselves on being unbiased and neutral evidence based forums on the referendum.
"I said I would speak to Professor Whatley about this and I emailed him and got a response from him. I contacted Ms Robison and said I was happy that there was no conflict and she responded to say she was satisfied."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article