A woman who says her estranged husband manipulated his finances to avoid paying her a share of his money has spent more than £1.5 million on a legal battle, a judge was told.
Michelle Young, 49, and Dundee-born businessman Scot Young, 51, have been fighting over money at a trial in the Family Division of the High Court, London.
Mrs Young says Mr Young is worth "a few billion at least" and claims "there was a vast fortune hidden". She says she is a victim of "fraud" because Mr Young has manipulated his affairs so as to do her down - and wants her fair share.
Mr Young disputes Mrs Young's claims. He says he is penniless and bankrupt and has debts that add up to £28m.
Judge Mr Justice Moor has been asked to decide how much Mr Young is worth.
A lawyer representing Mrs Young told the judge she had run up a bill of £1.6 million.
Rex Howling, QC, gave details of legal costs after summarising Ms Young's case. He said: "This is one of those cases ... which is like trying to locate a submarine without sonar," said Mr Howling "(But) we have had periscope sightings during the course of these proceedings."
Mr Young described his estranged wife's claims as "nonsense ... nonsense".
Mr Justice Moor suggested Mrs Young might have looked a gift horse in the mouth when she rejected a £300m settlement offer in 2009.
Mr Young has told the court the offer was not serious and was made after he had been drinking. But Mrs Young says it was serious and she says it indicated her husband was wealthy.
"If it was genuine, why didn't (Mrs Young) accept it?" asked the judge. "Gift horse and mouth come to mind."
The judge is due to deliver a ruling on Friday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article