DEVELOPERS behind a controversial wind farm refused permission by ministers last year have scaled down their plans drastically and re-submitted them for planning approval.
The original proposal was for 30 turbines near the village of Spittal in Caithness, but the new proposal is for just seven in the area.
Local opponents say it is still too many as the county already has 100 large turbines, with far more to come. At least one has not operated at times because the grid could not absorb all the energy generated.
Spittal Hill Wind Farm became the first to be refused by the Scottish Government for five years, with Energy Minister Fergus Ewing saying in June last year the cumulative visual effect of the original plan, considered with existing and consented farms nearby, was too much.
But Spittal Hill Windfarm Ltd said its revised plans have taken into account comments made by the public inquiry reporter, when he acknowledged the Spittal site could accommodate some turbines.
It said it had also considered what Scottish Natural Heritage's had said: "Five to seven smaller turbines would fit the character of small farms and crofts and mixed agriculture and settlement landscape character types."
The company is owned by a group of Highland-based shareholders and Statkraft, the Norwegian state-owned electricity firm that claims it is the largest renewable energy producer in Europe
It says the new project has an estimated capital investment of £27 million and could generate enough electricity for around 15,337 homes. There would be a community benefit fund of up to £105,000 annually or £2.625m over the 25-year operational life of the project.
North Highland College in Thurso, part of the University of the Highlands and Islands, could also get £40,000 for programmes to tackle youth unemployment.
Tom Pottinger, director of Spittal Hill Windfarm Ltd, said: "We have worked very hard to ensure that our revised proposals have taken on board the comments made on our last application, including dramatically reducing the number of turbines, relocating them so that they are now 2km from Spittal village and reducing their maximum height to 100m."
But Stuart Young, of Caithness Windfarm Information Forum (CWIF), said: "The company has another windfarm in Caithness, the 21-turbine Baillie development near Thurso. Since it opened on June 28 it has received £492,732 to stop Baillie operating for different periods because the grid couldn't take the power. Publicly available figures provide this information.
"In Caithness we already have 99 industrial turbines operational. There are 53 more approved but not yet constructed, another 35 submitted in planning applications, but not yet determined,and over 180 in scoping [being prepared for planning applications], as well as dozens of smaller turbines."
He agreed that SNH had told the inquiry the site could take up to seven smaller turbines.
"But since then another 20 turbines have been approved at Halsary and Achlachan right next to Spittal village, so they can't assume their new plans are consistent with SNH advice," he said. "The agency will have to consider this all again but it seems a reasonable assumption that they will now consider Spittal is overprovided with wind turbines."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article