THE Scottish Government has been urged to issue national guidance on how much wind farm developers should pay in community benefit.
The majority of developers deal directly with the communities most affected, but a study by Robert Gordon University suggests that this means power is firmly held by the companies, often to the detriment of residents in terms of the benefits they can secure.
Scottish Renewables recently launched a "protocol" stating that for every megawatt (MW) of installed capacity, £5000 of community benefit should be made available to invest in local priorities. The Highland Council set the figure as a benchmark several years ago.
But the report's authors believe that local government should play a more central role via the planning process.
Professor Peter Strachan, of RGU's Aberdeen Business School, said that community benefit packages had a curious position within the planning system, as they could not influence the determination of an application.
He said: "Scotland has witnessed a rapid expansion of onshore wind power during the past 12 years. Much of this is corporately owned.
"It is clear that after more than ten years of wind power deployment, Scottish local government lacks robust and nationally coordinated frameworks for strategically managing community benefits provision."
Developers should promote a variety of ownership arrangements, he said.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said it was for local authorities to decide how they wish to see community benefits distributed. But the Government was committed to maximising the opportunities for community benefits.
Meanwhile, a new report from Foundation Scotland predicts that the current annual figure of almost £7 million in community benefit from wind farms is likely to treble by 2017. But projecting forward to wind farmsplanned and being scoped, this amount could be closer to £50m by 2020.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article