TAXPAYERS suffered a loss of at least £230 million from the return of a 6% chunk of Lloyds Banking Group to the private sector, according to a National Audit Office (NAO) report.
The figure, which takes into account the cost of borrowing money to fund the £20 billion bail-out in 2009, appears to undermine a claim by Chancellor George Osborne that the share sale in September represented "a profit for taxpayers".
It would suggest that the overall loss on the £20bn bailout could be nearly £1.5bn if the rest of the stake is sold off at a similar price - though the NAO did not make such a calculation.
Mr Osborne trumpeted in the autumn that the £6.2bn Lloyds share sale had resulted in the national debt being reduced by more than half a billion pounds. This £586m figure represented the difference between the value for accounting purposes of the shares on the Treasury's books - at 61p - and the 75p sale price. The Treasury acknowledged at the time of the sell-off that the cash profit was far less, at £61m.
The report by the watchdog does not dispute the calculations but does take into account the effective interest paid to make the original investments in the bail-out. It recommends the Treasury should consider these costs when analysing the value of any future sale.
The report said the average rate paid for shares by the Government of 73.6p was effectively cut to 72.2p by the fact it had been paid back some of the money by Lloyds in fees -producing a cash profit of just under £120m. But it says that if the cost of financing is taken into account, the sale resulted in a shortfall of £230m.
UK Financial Investments, which manages the Government's stakes in the bailed-out banks, ran the sale in a process which the NAO said was "managed effectively and provided value for money".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article