A HEALTH board has had to apologise for the lack of appropriate care and advice given to a patient while she was pregnant and during the delivery of her baby, who was stillborn.
The woman, identified as Ms A in the report, had been admitted to Raigmore Hospital in Inverness in December 2011 as her waters had broken. The next day labour was speeded up but her baby was stillborn following shoulder dystocia, when the baby's shoulders become caught in the mother's pelvis.
Another party lodged the complaint about NHS Highland to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman Jim Martin because she was concerned that the management of Ms A's pregnancy and labour could have been handled better had staff been aware of previous complications she had experienced during the birth of her first child in 1997 and her second child in 2004.
Mr Martin called on NHS Highland to apologise for these failings. He said there should be a review of guidance to staff to ensure that risks of recurrent shoulder dystocia are discussed with mothers together with birthing options such as elective caesareans.
In addition, the antenatal midwife who looked after Ms A should be reminded of the importance of documenting previous history of shoulder dystocia in the handover note to the labour midwife.
NHS Highland Chief Executive, Elaine Mead, said the health board fully accepted the recommendations made and action was being taken.
"I want to publicly apologise on behalf of NHS Highland for our failures in the care and treatment we provided. I deeply regret that we were unable to provide an appropriate level of care."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article