A VIEW towards the world's oldest surviving sea-washed lighthouse could be "ruined" by a massive windfarm dwarfing the historic tower, planners fear.
Turbines planned for 10 miles off the Angus coast would be five times the size of the 200-year-old Bell Rock lighthouse, say Angus Council's planners.
The council is due to submit comments on the development to Marine Scotland and says the impact of the planned 213-turbine windfarm would be "significant and unacceptable" on the seascape.
The council will now ask Marine Scotland, which decides on offshore windfarms on behalf of the Scottish ministers, to look deeper into the effects of the 450 megawatt windfarm.
Bell Rock Lighthouse expert David Taylor said: "The view of the lighthouse will be ruined. It's really a despoiling act to build this windfarm."
In the report, Angus Council planning chief Vivien Smith said: "The Bell Rock lighthouse is the only tall structure in the seaward view and, apart from passing ships, the only light source at night on an otherwise dark horizon. It is evident that the proposed development will have an impact on the seascape."
With other planned turbine developments she says "significant cumulative seascape effect" is possible.
Inch Cape Offshore Limited (ICOL) won development rights in 2011 for the site on the Bell Rock or Inchcape reef. Historic Scotland and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency have not objected to the proposal. Scottish Natural Heritage has yet to respond.
The council says a seascape assessment from the developers "has a number of shortcomings" and does not reference the lighthouse.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article