NICOLA Seal was fit and active until a tick bite on Rum led to years of ill-health.
Dr Seal, 39, from Aberdeen, was on the island watching deer in May 2008, when she noticed an itch on her chest, saw an insect and pulled it off. The bite was not sore and she thought no more about it until 11 days later when she suddenly felt unwell. She had a severe stomach ache, sore knees, a headache, stiff neck and felt as if she had flu.
"I remembered the tick bite, and though I didn't know much about Lyme disease I had been told that it attacked the knees," she said. "I went to the GP and he referred me to the hospital."
Doctors suspected Lyme disease and she was given antibiotics which seemed to work, but about a month later she became unwell again. "I was walking strangely, I was also getting dizzy, feeling nauseous, and finding it difficult to think. My brain processes seemed to slow down and my memory was affected," she said. "Later I started having problems with co-ordination."
Dr Seal saw a specialist doctor in England on a private basis. He diagnosed Lyme disease and recommended intravenous antibiotics. Dr Seal had one course on the NHS, followed by two courses privately at a cost of £8000.
Her condition improved following the three months of IV treatment and a further 13 months of oral antibiotics.
In December 2010 she gave birth to her daughter Ruby but last year she suffered a relapse. She decided to seek treatment in the United States, where she said doctors are more informed about the disease.
While the treatment helped restore her health, it has been expensive. To date she has spent more than £20,000 on travel, consultations and medicine.
The disease has also affected her future plans, she said.
"I'd like to have another baby, but I'm worried that I could pass the disease on to my unborn child."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article